The credibility of the climate change report that shared the Nobel prize with Al Gore continues to melt, and it’s time for President Obama to call for a complete review of the data before Congress acts further on cap-and-trade legislation, or his administration engages in more climate treaty talks.

In addition, the president should abandon his scheme to repurpose NASA with a focus on climate change, and should stick with plans for a 2020 moon landing and further exploration of our solar system.

In the continually unfolding saga of man-made global warming theory, we now learn that some claims in the IPCC report were based on anecdotal stories from mountain climbers and on a paper by an activist student that never received the scrutiny of scientific peer review. This comes on the heels of revelations that alarming assertions about Himalayan glacier melt rates were drawn from a World Wildlife Fund report that pulled a speculative 1999 remark by a little-known Indian scientist from a popular magazine. IPCC chairman Raj Pachauri has since hired that obscure scientist, and used his speculation to secure huge grants from the Carnegie Corporation and the European Union.

Americans need to erase their childhood memories of the U.N. as a benevolent organization that delivers bags of oatmeal to doe-eyed starving children, and realize that, as former U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. John Bolton told me recently, everything at the United Nations is highly politicized.

It seems increasingly obvious that ‘sexed up data’ gets used to push policies and treaties by scientists better classified as salesmen, as Bill Whittle, Steve Green and I discussed on a recent episode of Trifecta on PJTV.com.

Man-made global warming advocates at the Copenhagen climate change conference in December intended to redistribute hundreds of billions of dollars from prosperous nations to regimes which have rejected the rule of law, individual liberty, women’s rights and free market prosperity. And these ‘scientists’ won’t let shaky data stand in the way of their Utopian collectivist schemes.

Of course, the notion that third-world nations which have failed to develop modern economies thanks to a blend of repressive, corrupt, totalitarian religion and government will suddenly spawn enlightened, climate-neutral modern economies thanks to huge influxes of external cash is prima facie doofustic — stupid at first sight.