Meet the Men Whose Words President Clinton Thinks We Should Fear and Guard Against
Bill Clinton thinks this man is dangerous. Is he?
Watch Trifecta episode #3482 [11 min.]
UPDATE: You can now listen to Trifecta co-host Scott Ott’s complete audio interview with a member of Bill Clinton’s dangerous-words regiment, Billy Beck, using the audio player below.
[audio:/ScottOtt/LiveTheFreedom/DangerousWords.mp3]
Download the mp3 file for your mobile audio device. [17.5 MB]
UPDATE II: Scott Ott’s interview with Mike Vanderboegh, whose “Three Percenters” movement has been branded as dangerous by President Bill Clinton, and the Southern Poverty Law Center and who’s called a “hatriot” by John Avlon in his book, “Wingnuts: How the Lunatic Fringe is Hijacking America”. It’s a lengthy interview, by modern standards, almost 37 minutes, so just listen to it like you would a talk radio show.
[audio:/ScottOtt/LiveTheFreedom/ThreePercenters.mp3]
Download the mp3 file for your mobile audio device. [16.7 MB]
[...] I took a phone call from Scott Ott. He's a nice guy and we talked for about twenty minutes. PJTV. You know, the ex-president is a Lying Bastard — just like I've said for about fifteen years — [...]
[...] Scott Ott of Scrappleface follows the breadcrumbs to Billy's communication portal, and, in a PJTV debut, Billy makes it real, and carries his principles large. Give a listen. It can only be good. [...]
Excellent interview and interesting man. Like you, I strongly disagree with him on some points. But I found him thoughtful and well spoken. He is certainly not deserving of the slander he received at the hands of our former President. Why is it every time I see or hear Bill Clinton my reaction is, “Shame on you!”
I have passed this along.
[...] Scott Ott, he of Scrappleface, called Beck on the phone to talk about it. Worth a listen. [...]
[...] Ott, the satirist who does Scrappleface, conducts a serious interview with Billy Beck about Bill Clinton quoting him anonymously. Billy in turn blames it all on me! No, I’m [...]
never make the mistake that the distinction between “public property” and “private property” is a sensible or valid dichotomy that has anything to do with the principles of life/liberty/property.
read “the tragedy of the commons.”